ArcAI is a capable, enterprise-grade platform for AI search visibility, but many teams want faster rollout, broader engine coverage, or a different price point. If you need to track visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google’s AI results without adopting a full enterprise suite, this guide will help you choose a better-fit tool.
Who this is for
Marketing leaders, SEO teams, and agencies that need reliable monitoring of AI answers and citations, proof of what users actually see, and workflows that turn “we are not cited” into concrete content fixes.
Quick Picks (TL;DR)
- Best overall: Rankability’s AI Analyzer
- Best cross-engine monitoring: Peec AI
- Best indie value: LLMrefs
- Best enterprise analytics: Profound
- Best mid-market breadth: AthenaHQ
- Best plug-and-play for SE Ranking users: SE Ranking – AI Visibility
- Best evidence and screenshots: ZipTie
How we chose
- Coverage breadth across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, and (where relevant) Copilot/DeepSeek/Grok
- Data collection transparency (sampling cadence, screenshots/full text), exportability, and history
- Actionability (turning “we’re missing” into “here’s how to win the citation”)
- Scalability for agencies/enterprise (seats, SSO/API, roles)
- Price-to-value using current public pricing/pages at publish (verify before buying; this market shifts fast).
Comparison Table
Pricing changes often, so verify on vendor pages before purchase.
| Tool | Best for | Starting price* | Engines/coverage (examples) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rankability AI Analyzer | Agencies & content teams that want monitoring → fixes in one stack | From $124/mo (annual, suite) | ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Copilot, DeepSeek | Analyzer lives in Rankability’s suite; confirm seat/prompt limits and exact coverage per tier. |
| Peec AI | Cross-engine dashboards, exports, unlimited seats | €89/mo (Starter) | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AIO (add-ons for others) | Agency-friendly; costs scale with prompts/countries; add-ons expand engines. |
| LLMrefs | Solo/SMB on-ramp; quick validation | $79/mo (Pro) | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity (others added over time) | Freemium available; weekly trend reports; CSV exports. |
| Profound | Enterprise-grade analytics with smaller entry plan | $499/mo (billed yearly) | 4 engines (e.g., ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AIO) | Lite plan published; full platform targets enterprise—evaluate complexity vs needs. |
| AthenaHQ | Mid-market teams needing breadth + action guidance | $295+/mo (Starter) | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AIO/AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok | Credit-based (1 credit = 1 AI response across models); unlimited seats/roles noted. |
| SE Ranking AI Visibility | SMBs/agencies already using SE Ranking | $89/mo (add-on) | AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT (others emerging) | Add-on pricing and prompt limits vary by core plan; confirm modules. |
| ZipTie | Proof-oriented teams that need screenshots & checks | $179/mo (Basic) | AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity | Priced by “AI search checks”; includes GSC connections & indexing checks. |
*Starting prices change often—verify current pricing before purchase.
Mini-reviews
1. Rankability’s AI Analyzer (Editor’s Choice)
Who it’s for: Agencies/content teams wanting “see it → fix it” inside one stack.
Why it’s a strong ArcAI alternative: Tight loop from prompt testing and citation mapping to content updates via Rankability’s Optimizer.
Coverage snapshot: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews/AI Mode, Copilot, DeepSeek.
Pricing snapshot: Part of the Rankability suite (SMB-friendly entry; confirm Analyzer access per tier).
2. Peec AI
Who it’s for: Teams needing multi-engine visibility with exports and unlimited seats.
Why it’s a strong ArcAI alternative: Clean reporting, daily runs in higher tiers, and modular engine add-ons.
Coverage: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AIO (+ optional engines).
Pricing: Starter €89; Pro €199; Enterprise €499+.
3. LLMrefs
Who it’s for: Solo marketers/SMBs testing AI visibility with low friction.
Why: Freemium start, Pro at $79 with weekly reports and CSV exports.
Coverage: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity (expanding).
4. Profound
Who it’s for: Enterprise-leaning teams that want deeper analytics; now with a lower-cost Lite tier.
Why: Conversation Explorer, visibility dashboards, and benchmarking at scale.
Coverage: 4 AI engines; confirm which ones for your plan.
Pricing: Lite $499/mo (annual); enterprise custom.
5. AthenaHQ
Who it’s for: Growth-stage SaaS/mid-market brands needing broad coverage + action guidance.
Why: Tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, AIO/AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok; credits map clearly to responses.
Pricing: Starter from $295+/mo; larger tiers scale credits & integrations.
6. SE Ranking’s AI Visibility Tracker
Who it’s for: SE Ranking users who want AI modules without adopting new tooling.
Why: Familiar UI; AI Overviews/AI Mode + ChatGPT tracking; “No-cited” gap discovery.
Pricing: Add-on from $89/mo; prompts vary by core plan.
7. ZipTie
Who it’s for: Teams needing auditable screenshots and high-volume “AI search checks.”
Why: Evidence-first capture for AIO/ChatGPT/Perplexity, reports, and GSC tie-ins.
Pricing: Basic $179/mo (1,000 checks); up to $799/mo (10,000 checks).
Pick by use case
- Agencies: Rankability, SE Ranking add-on, AthenaHQ
- Enterprise: Profound, AthenaHQ, (ArcAI if you want all-in enterprise)
- SMB / startup: LLMrefs, Rankability (lower tiers), Peec AI
- Proof & audit (screenshots): ZipTie
Implementation checklist
- Define prompt sets by funnel stage/persona (brand + commercial + competitor)
- Set sampling cadence (daily/weekly) and minimum re-runs per prompt for volatility
- Track “no-cite” gaps and map each to a fix (content upgrade, source consolidation, distribution)
- Align reporting: exec roll-ups vs. practitioner-level diffs
- QA engines, locales, and languages before expanding scope
FAQs
Is ArcAI overkill for smaller teams?
Often, yes—ArcAI’s strength is enterprise breadth and packaged guidance. Smaller teams can get 80% of what they need from lighter tools at a fraction of the cost.
Do I need both traditional rank tracking and AI visibility?
Even the best AI visibility tools complement, not replace, traditional rank tracking. LLMs frequently retrieve from public search; strong visibility in classic SERPs supports your chances of being cited in AI answers. Track both to see the whole picture..
How often should I retest prompts?
Volatile categories (news, fast-moving SaaS) benefit from more frequent sampling; most teams start weekly and move high-value prompts to daily as needed.
Final word
If ArcAI’s enterprise weight or pricing isn’t the fit, start with Rankability’s AI Analyzer for a tight monitoring→optimization loop, or pick from the shortlist above based on your stack. Then standardize prompts, sampling, and “no-cite → fix” workflows so your visibility—and citations—climb steadily.
Free GEO Checklist – Download the complete 97-point checklist to optimize your brand for AI-powered search engines like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.