Are Redirect Chains a Google Ranking Factor?

Technical SEO Guide 2025 Updated: January 2025

Verdict

Redirect chains are not a direct Google ranking factor.

Impact: Indirect – they affect speed, crawl efficiency, and canonical clarity.

Priority: Medium – important to fix, especially on high-value pages.

Why Redirect Chains Matter

Redirect chains happen when one URL redirects to another, and then to another, instead of going directly to the final page. Google has made it clear that 3xx redirects no longer cause PageRank loss on their own, so the existence of a redirect chain will not automatically reduce rankings. However, they create several indirect problems that can negatively influence visibility:

Page Speed and Core Web Vitals

Each redirect adds extra round trips before a browser or crawler reaches the final content. These extra hops slow down load times and can hurt Core Web Vitals, particularly Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and Time to First Byte (TTFB). Since Google considers page experience signals in its ranking systems, redirect chains can indirectly affect performance.

Crawl Budget and Indexing Efficiency

Googlebot can follow up to around 10 redirect hops, but long chains waste crawl budget. On large sites, this can delay or prevent some pages from being crawled and indexed effectively. Google recommends avoiding redirect chains for this reason and going straight to the final URL.

Canonical and Relevance Signals

Redirect type matters. Server-side 301 or 308 redirects are treated as strong canonical signals. Temporary 302 or 307 redirects, or client-side solutions like JavaScript and meta refresh, send weaker signals. In chains, especially with mixed redirect types, canonical intent can become unclear, which may confuse Google about the correct page to index.

What Good Looks Like

  • Redirects should go straight from the old URL to the final destination.
  • Permanent changes should always use server-side 301 or 308 redirects.
  • Internal links, canonical tags, and XML sitemaps should point to the final URLs, not redirected ones.
  • Common sources of unnecessary chains (e.g., HTTP → HTTPS → WWW → trailing slash) should be consolidated into a single hop.

How to Check for Redirect Chains

PageSpeed Insights or Lighthouse

Look for the "Avoid multiple page redirects" audit.

Crawling Tools

Use Screaming Frog, Sitebulb, or a similar crawler to identify redirect chains and measure their length.

Search Console

Review indexing reports for "Page with redirect" or "Redirect error" issues.

Manual Check

Run curl -I https://your-url.com to see the response path.

Action Plan

Flatten Chains

Update redirect rules so URLs resolve in a single step. For example, instead of A → B → C → D, go directly from A → D.

Update Internal References

Change navigation links, content links, canonicals, and sitemaps to point to the final destination URLs. This prevents search engines and users from ever hitting the redirect.

Standardize URL Structures

Decide on one protocol (HTTPS), one host format (with or without "www"), and one trailing-slash convention. Configure your server to enforce this consistently.

Use the Right Redirect Type

Apply 301 or 308 for permanent moves. Use temporary redirects (302, 307) only in short-term cases and update them when the change becomes permanent.

Monitor and Maintain

After fixes, re-crawl your site and re-check performance metrics. Continue monitoring for new redirect chains after site migrations, redesigns, or URL changes.

Key Takeaway

Redirect chains do not directly reduce rankings, but they slow down page loads, waste crawl budget, and weaken canonical signals. These indirect effects can harm search performance over time. The best practice is to keep redirects to one hop at most, update internal links to point directly to the final URL, and use proper redirect types.

Sources & References (120+ Sources)